https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155833 Recovery by sale of the petitioner's property was to remain in abeyance until the pending review application under section 4-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act was finally decided, because liability to sales tax depended on that determination. The Court considered it necessary to protect the petitioner from irreversible sale proceedings while the eligibility issue remained unresolved. At the same time, the respondents were permitted to attach the petitioner's property for recovery of the impugned dues, preserving the revenue's security pending the review outcome. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Sep 2013 13:15:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155833 Recovery by sale of the petitioner's property was to remain in abeyance until the pending review application under section 4-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act was finally decided, because liability to sales tax depended on that determination. The Court considered it necessary to protect the petitioner from irreversible sale proceedings while the eligibility issue remained unresolved. At the same time, the respondents were permitted to attach the petitioner's property for recovery of the impugned dues, preserving the revenue's security pending the review outcome. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 29 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155833