<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 385 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155824</link>
    <description>Section 3(1-A) of the Punjab Entertainment Duty Act, 1955, introduced a lump sum entertainment duty for video tape, video cassette and video record exhibitions, while cinema shows remained taxable on a per capita basis under section 3(1). The classification was treated as valid because it rested on real differences in the mode, medium, magnitude and surroundings of the entertainments. The text states that article 14 does not bar the State from taxing distinct forms of entertainment differently where the distinction is substantial and relevant, and that the levy under section 3(1-A) was upheld as not discriminatory.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 12:45:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 385 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155824</link>
      <description>Section 3(1-A) of the Punjab Entertainment Duty Act, 1955, introduced a lump sum entertainment duty for video tape, video cassette and video record exhibitions, while cinema shows remained taxable on a per capita basis under section 3(1). The classification was treated as valid because it rested on real differences in the mode, medium, magnitude and surroundings of the entertainments. The text states that article 14 does not bar the State from taxing distinct forms of entertainment differently where the distinction is substantial and relevant, and that the levy under section 3(1-A) was upheld as not discriminatory.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>