<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 270 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155820</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeal, directing the respondent Board to appoint the appellant as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) due to his qualifications and limitations, relaxing the typing test requirement and protecting his pay scale. The Court dismissed the appellant&#039;s objections against the Medical Board, emphasizing its impartiality and sympathetic evaluation of his capabilities. The appellant was found unfit for a Sub-Station Attendant role but eligible for a clerical position based on his ability to write with his left hand. The Court did not entertain allegations against the Medical Board and upheld the decision in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 270 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155820</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeal, directing the respondent Board to appoint the appellant as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) due to his qualifications and limitations, relaxing the typing test requirement and protecting his pay scale. The Court dismissed the appellant&#039;s objections against the Medical Board, emphasizing its impartiality and sympathetic evaluation of his capabilities. The appellant was found unfit for a Sub-Station Attendant role but eligible for a clerical position based on his ability to write with his left hand. The Court did not entertain allegations against the Medical Board and upheld the decision in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>