<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 945 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), MUMBAI-III</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155815</link>
    <description>The Commissioner upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal in favor of M/s. Pejawar Electronics, as the loading of software on PLCs was not considered manufacturing for the purpose of Central Excise duty levy. Consequently, the respondent remained eligible for SSI exemption under Notification 1/93.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 18:43:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 945 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), MUMBAI-III</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155815</link>
      <description>The Commissioner upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal in favor of M/s. Pejawar Electronics, as the loading of software on PLCs was not considered manufacturing for the purpose of Central Excise duty levy. Consequently, the respondent remained eligible for SSI exemption under Notification 1/93.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>