<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 451 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155796</link>
    <description>Rule 3(66) of the Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1941 permits grant and renewal of an eligibility certificate for a newly set up small-scale industry only for the period and conditions stated in the rule. Renewal cannot be refused on the basis of closure of the industrial unit or other later events unless a disqualifying circumstance is shown to have arisen during the relevant period. The decisive question is whether the dealer satisfied the statutory conditions when renewal was sought; subsequent closure does not retrospectively defeat earlier entitlement. Refusal founded on extraneous post-period considerations is inconsistent with the rule and unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 17:47:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 451 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155796</link>
      <description>Rule 3(66) of the Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1941 permits grant and renewal of an eligibility certificate for a newly set up small-scale industry only for the period and conditions stated in the rule. Renewal cannot be refused on the basis of closure of the industrial unit or other later events unless a disqualifying circumstance is shown to have arisen during the relevant period. The decisive question is whether the dealer satisfied the statutory conditions when renewal was sought; subsequent closure does not retrospectively defeat earlier entitlement. Refusal founded on extraneous post-period considerations is inconsistent with the rule and unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>