<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 436 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155785</link>
    <description>Classification under a sales tax notification depends on the common or commercial meaning of the goods, not on a scientific description. The mere printing of &quot;stainless steel&quot; on the package was not decisive. On the record, the blades were magnetic, susceptible to corrosion, and lacked the ordinary characteristics associated with stainless steel articles. Earlier notification history also showed that shaving blades had been separately dealt with rather than treated as stainless steel goods. Applying popular understanding, material characteristics, and legislative treatment, the blades were held not to fall within the stainless steel entry and were taxable as an unclassified item.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 17:03:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 436 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155785</link>
      <description>Classification under a sales tax notification depends on the common or commercial meaning of the goods, not on a scientific description. The mere printing of &quot;stainless steel&quot; on the package was not decisive. On the record, the blades were magnetic, susceptible to corrosion, and lacked the ordinary characteristics associated with stainless steel articles. Earlier notification history also showed that shaving blades had been separately dealt with rather than treated as stainless steel goods. Applying popular understanding, material characteristics, and legislative treatment, the blades were held not to fall within the stainless steel entry and were taxable as an unclassified item.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>