<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 450 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155784</link>
    <description>A sales tax exemption for a co-operative federation&#039;s baby milk food was analysed as a reasonable classification because the federation was Government-controlled and operated on a no-profit no-loss basis, unlike a private manufacturer. The exemption was treated as a concession intended to support a newly introduced product, so the hostile classification challenge failed. The notification was also held to fit within section 9(1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act because the power to exempt a class of persons may validly be linked to the goods forming their exempt turnover. The challenge that the notification was ultra vires therefore failed, and the exemption was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 16:51:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 450 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155784</link>
      <description>A sales tax exemption for a co-operative federation&#039;s baby milk food was analysed as a reasonable classification because the federation was Government-controlled and operated on a no-profit no-loss basis, unlike a private manufacturer. The exemption was treated as a concession intended to support a newly introduced product, so the hostile classification challenge failed. The notification was also held to fit within section 9(1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act because the power to exempt a class of persons may validly be linked to the goods forming their exempt turnover. The challenge that the notification was ultra vires therefore failed, and the exemption was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>