<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (6) TMI 315 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155763</link>
    <description>The court held that the sales by the respondent to the dealers did not qualify as ultimate or penultimate in the export chain, thus not meeting the criteria for exemption under section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The State&#039;s revision was allowed, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the respondent, with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 15:46:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (6) TMI 315 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155763</link>
      <description>The court held that the sales by the respondent to the dealers did not qualify as ultimate or penultimate in the export chain, thus not meeting the criteria for exemption under section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The State&#039;s revision was allowed, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the respondent, with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>