<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 384 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155746</link>
    <description>The requirement under rule 30-A(1)(b) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules to file the original manufacturer&#039;s declaration along with the return was treated as directory, not mandatory, because the declaration is issued by a third party and is not wholly within the dealer&#039;s control. On that reasoning, the declaration need not accompany the return strictly at filing and may be accepted if produced any time before the assessment order is made. The operative principle is that a procedural filing condition depending on third-party compliance should not defeat substantive compliance where the document is furnished before assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 15:02:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 384 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155746</link>
      <description>The requirement under rule 30-A(1)(b) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules to file the original manufacturer&#039;s declaration along with the return was treated as directory, not mandatory, because the declaration is issued by a third party and is not wholly within the dealer&#039;s control. On that reasoning, the declaration need not accompany the return strictly at filing and may be accepted if produced any time before the assessment order is made. The operative principle is that a procedural filing condition depending on third-party compliance should not defeat substantive compliance where the document is furnished before assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>