<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 815 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155744</link>
    <description>Section 129A of the Customs Act excludes Tribunal jurisdiction over appeals relating to goods imported or exported as baggage. Because the impugned order concerned baggage goods, the statutory bar applied and the appeal could not be entertained. The Tribunal therefore lacked jurisdiction and the appeal was held not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 07:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 815 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155744</link>
      <description>Section 129A of the Customs Act excludes Tribunal jurisdiction over appeals relating to goods imported or exported as baggage. Because the impugned order concerned baggage goods, the statutory bar applied and the appeal could not be entertained. The Tribunal therefore lacked jurisdiction and the appeal was held not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>