<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 814 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155734</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, granting them interest on the delayed refund from three months after the final order in 1999. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to legal provisions for timely refund processing and interest payment, citing relevant case laws to support the appellants&#039; entitlement to interest on delayed refunds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 12:04:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 814 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155734</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, granting them interest on the delayed refund from three months after the final order in 1999. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to legal provisions for timely refund processing and interest payment, citing relevant case laws to support the appellants&#039; entitlement to interest on delayed refunds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>