<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 866 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155728</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, as Section 11AC was not invoked. The Tribunal held that the lower authorities exceeded the scope of the show-cause notice, emphasizing the necessity of correctly applying relevant provisions when imposing penalties under Central Excise laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 11:37:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 866 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155728</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, as Section 11AC was not invoked. The Tribunal held that the lower authorities exceeded the scope of the show-cause notice, emphasizing the necessity of correctly applying relevant provisions when imposing penalties under Central Excise laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>