https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155722 An interim stay granted by the Supreme Court in proceedings arising from an earlier judgment does not erase that judgment or displace its precedential value; the earlier ruling continues to bind and may be relied on by persons who were not parties to the stayed proceedings. Applying that principle, the earlier Division Bench decision remained operative despite interim protection in special leave matters. The document also states that vesting under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act could not be continued where the statute lacked a lawful compensation mechanism, as continued enforcement in the absence of adequate compensation was incompatible with Article 300A. The writ petitioner succeeded and the State was restrained from proceeding on the existing statutory footing. en-us Mon, 14 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Oct 2024 17:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155722 An interim stay granted by the Supreme Court in proceedings arising from an earlier judgment does not erase that judgment or displace its precedential value; the earlier ruling continues to bind and may be relied on by persons who were not parties to the stayed proceedings. Applying that principle, the earlier Division Bench decision remained operative despite interim protection in special leave matters. The document also states that vesting under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act could not be continued where the statute lacked a lawful compensation mechanism, as continued enforcement in the absence of adequate compensation was incompatible with Article 300A. The writ petitioner succeeded and the State was restrained from proceeding on the existing statutory footing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155722