<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 364 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155718</link>
    <description>In a tax appeal under section 31 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, an assessee is not barred from raising additional grounds merely because a turnover was omitted from the original memorandum of appeal. Section 31 and rule 27, read with Form I, contain no express prohibition against such grounds, and the appellate authority&#039;s wide powers to confirm, reduce, enhance, annul or otherwise deal with the assessment are not limited by civil-litigation style pleading rules. Admission of additional grounds remains subject to the appellate authority&#039;s judicial discretion, including consideration of limitation. The earlier contrary view was held unsound and overruled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 18:30:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 364 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155718</link>
      <description>In a tax appeal under section 31 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, an assessee is not barred from raising additional grounds merely because a turnover was omitted from the original memorandum of appeal. Section 31 and rule 27, read with Form I, contain no express prohibition against such grounds, and the appellate authority&#039;s wide powers to confirm, reduce, enhance, annul or otherwise deal with the assessment are not limited by civil-litigation style pleading rules. Admission of additional grounds remains subject to the appellate authority&#039;s judicial discretion, including consideration of limitation. The earlier contrary view was held unsound and overruled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>