<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 382 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155713</link>
    <description>Government Orders of 1971 did not amount to a statutory sales tax exemption under the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962, because exemption required a specific notification under section 5. They were treated only as policy directions, and promissory estoppel was unavailable where the dealer proceeded without a notification and retained tax collected from consumers. A notification shifting the point of levy under section 4(7) was also upheld because that power had been recognised and the challenge depended on the rejected claim of exemption and estoppel. The levy and related recovery measures were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 18:07:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 382 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155713</link>
      <description>Government Orders of 1971 did not amount to a statutory sales tax exemption under the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962, because exemption required a specific notification under section 5. They were treated only as policy directions, and promissory estoppel was unavailable where the dealer proceeded without a notification and retained tax collected from consumers. A notification shifting the point of levy under section 4(7) was also upheld because that power had been recognised and the challenge depended on the rejected claim of exemption and estoppel. The levy and related recovery measures were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>