<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 301 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155697</link>
    <description>The Karnataka Sales Tax Act exemption for student note-books was construed broadly to extend beyond sales tax and cover turnover tax under section 6-B. The term &quot;tax&quot; in section 2(1)(u) was read as wide enough to include tax leviable under the Act generally, and section 8-A was held to confer power to exempt or reduce tax on any item under the Act. The temporary explanation to section 8-A(3-A) did not curtail that power, and the second proviso to section 6-B(1) was treated as governing computation of turnover rather than excluding exemptions. On that construction, the clarification denying exemption from turnover tax was incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:51:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 301 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155697</link>
      <description>The Karnataka Sales Tax Act exemption for student note-books was construed broadly to extend beyond sales tax and cover turnover tax under section 6-B. The term &quot;tax&quot; in section 2(1)(u) was read as wide enough to include tax leviable under the Act generally, and section 8-A was held to confer power to exempt or reduce tax on any item under the Act. The temporary explanation to section 8-A(3-A) did not curtail that power, and the second proviso to section 6-B(1) was treated as governing computation of turnover rather than excluding exemptions. On that construction, the clarification denying exemption from turnover tax was incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>