<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 362 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155696</link>
    <description>Section 12A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was construed to permit reassessment not only for escaped turnover but also where tax had been levied at a rate lower than the lawful rate, including cases of under-assessment, wrong deductions, or wrongly allowed exemptions. The power was held to extend even when the relevant turnover had already been before the assessing authority at the original assessment. On the classification point, reassessment of rayon yarn was treated as correction of the applicable rate for the same turnover, not as a fresh jurisdictional exercise beyond section 12A. The challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:47:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 362 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155696</link>
      <description>Section 12A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was construed to permit reassessment not only for escaped turnover but also where tax had been levied at a rate lower than the lawful rate, including cases of under-assessment, wrong deductions, or wrongly allowed exemptions. The power was held to extend even when the relevant turnover had already been before the assessing authority at the original assessment. On the classification point, reassessment of rayon yarn was treated as correction of the applicable rate for the same turnover, not as a fresh jurisdictional exercise beyond section 12A. The challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>