<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 333 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155694</link>
    <description>Cancellation of a registration certificate cannot be sustained where a timely show-cause reply was filed and delivered to the sales tax office but was ignored by the competent authority. The record showed that the reply had been submitted within the time allowed, yet the cancellation proceeded on the mistaken assumption that no reply existed. For that reason, the cancellation order and the revisional order were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after taking the reply into account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:41:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 333 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155694</link>
      <description>Cancellation of a registration certificate cannot be sustained where a timely show-cause reply was filed and delivered to the sales tax office but was ignored by the competent authority. The record showed that the reply had been submitted within the time allowed, yet the cancellation proceeded on the mistaken assumption that no reply existed. For that reason, the cancellation order and the revisional order were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after taking the reply into account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>