<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 389 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155681</link>
    <description>Weighing charges for goods supplied before delivery were treated as delivery-related charges under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act&#039;s sale price definition, which includes sums charged for work done in respect of goods at or before delivery unless separately charged freight, delivery or installation costs are excluded. Applying analogous Supreme Court-approved construction, the material question was whether tulai was separately recovered from customers. Because the charges were separately shown, they were not treated as included in the sale price on that basis, yet the assessee still obtained no relief and the revision was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:50:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 389 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155681</link>
      <description>Weighing charges for goods supplied before delivery were treated as delivery-related charges under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act&#039;s sale price definition, which includes sums charged for work done in respect of goods at or before delivery unless separately charged freight, delivery or installation costs are excluded. Applying analogous Supreme Court-approved construction, the material question was whether tulai was separately recovered from customers. Because the charges were separately shown, they were not treated as included in the sale price on that basis, yet the assessee still obtained no relief and the revision was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>