<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 378 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155679</link>
    <description>The Punjab General Sales Tax scheme permitted single-point taxation on bardana at the first stage of sale, so a later intra-State sale was not taxable. A challenge alleging discrimination failed because rice millers and similar dealers were not shown to be in the same class as the exempted categories under the rules. No violation of natural justice was found, and the statutory framework supported recovery of tax wrongly collected on subsequent sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:46:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 378 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155679</link>
      <description>The Punjab General Sales Tax scheme permitted single-point taxation on bardana at the first stage of sale, so a later intra-State sale was not taxable. A challenge alleging discrimination failed because rice millers and similar dealers were not shown to be in the same class as the exempted categories under the rules. No violation of natural justice was found, and the statutory framework supported recovery of tax wrongly collected on subsequent sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>