<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 809 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155668</link>
    <description>The case focused on the valuation of excisable goods based on a trade discount claimed by the assessee, the interpretation of the agreement between the respondent and M/s. L&amp;amp;T Ltd., and determining the role of M/s. L&amp;amp;T Ltd. as either an agent or distributor. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the Orders-in-Original, supporting the respondent&#039;s position that M/s. L&amp;amp;T Ltd. acted as a distributor, justifying the trade discount claimed. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue, emphasizing the importance of contractual terms and transaction evidence in resolving disputes related to excisable goods transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:01:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 809 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155668</link>
      <description>The case focused on the valuation of excisable goods based on a trade discount claimed by the assessee, the interpretation of the agreement between the respondent and M/s. L&amp;amp;T Ltd., and determining the role of M/s. L&amp;amp;T Ltd. as either an agent or distributor. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the Orders-in-Original, supporting the respondent&#039;s position that M/s. L&amp;amp;T Ltd. acted as a distributor, justifying the trade discount claimed. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue, emphasizing the importance of contractual terms and transaction evidence in resolving disputes related to excisable goods transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>