https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155666 Communication of an adjudicating authority's decision through a Superintendent was sufficient where the order clearly recorded rejection of the request for single registration. The Tribunal held that the absence of a separately served formal copy did not render the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) non-maintainable, because the communicated letter conveyed the decision itself. The objection to maintainability therefore failed, and the challenge to the rejection order was not accepted. The dismissal of the appeal left the order rejecting single registration undisturbed. en-us Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:57:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155666 Communication of an adjudicating authority's decision through a Superintendent was sufficient where the order clearly recorded rejection of the request for single registration. The Tribunal held that the absence of a separately served formal copy did not render the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) non-maintainable, because the communicated letter conveyed the decision itself. The objection to maintainability therefore failed, and the challenge to the rejection order was not accepted. The dismissal of the appeal left the order rejecting single registration undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155666