<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 361 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155663</link>
    <description>Under the second proviso to section 14 of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, a refund claim is barred where reassessment proceedings are pending, because the provision uses clear and unambiguous language requiring literal construction. A notice issued under section 12(8) was treated as sufficient to constitute an order for reassessment for this purpose, since the proviso extends until reassessment is finalised. Section 14-D was read as operating in a separate field, empowering the Commissioner to withhold refund where the refund order is under appeal or other proceedings, so no inconsistency arose between the two provisions. Refund therefore cannot be granted until the reassessment proceeding ends.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:48:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 361 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155663</link>
      <description>Under the second proviso to section 14 of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, a refund claim is barred where reassessment proceedings are pending, because the provision uses clear and unambiguous language requiring literal construction. A notice issued under section 12(8) was treated as sufficient to constitute an order for reassessment for this purpose, since the proviso extends until reassessment is finalised. Section 14-D was read as operating in a separate field, empowering the Commissioner to withhold refund where the refund order is under appeal or other proceedings, so no inconsistency arose between the two provisions. Refund therefore cannot be granted until the reassessment proceeding ends.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>