<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 706 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155644</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for Restoration of Appeal due to the applicant&#039;s failure to comply with the Stay-Order within the specified time frame and the absence of a sufficient cause for the delay in depositing the required amount. The Judge emphasized the importance of timely compliance with statutory orders and the need for valid reasons when seeking restoration of dismissed appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:47:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 706 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155644</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for Restoration of Appeal due to the applicant&#039;s failure to comply with the Stay-Order within the specified time frame and the absence of a sufficient cause for the delay in depositing the required amount. The Judge emphasized the importance of timely compliance with statutory orders and the need for valid reasons when seeking restoration of dismissed appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>