<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 806 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155640</link>
    <description>Goods manufactured on a job-work basis remained eligible for the concessional duty rate under the relevant exemption notification. The Tribunal treated the procedure in the earlier notification as optional rather than mandatory, so the principal manufacturer&#039;s failure to follow that procedure did not defeat the exemption claim. In the absence of that optional election, the job worker, or the person to whom the goods were supplied, was to be treated as the manufacturer for exemption purposes. The assessee therefore retained the concessional benefit, and the duty demand was not restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:16:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 806 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155640</link>
      <description>Goods manufactured on a job-work basis remained eligible for the concessional duty rate under the relevant exemption notification. The Tribunal treated the procedure in the earlier notification as optional rather than mandatory, so the principal manufacturer&#039;s failure to follow that procedure did not defeat the exemption claim. In the absence of that optional election, the job worker, or the person to whom the goods were supplied, was to be treated as the manufacturer for exemption purposes. The assessee therefore retained the concessional benefit, and the duty demand was not restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>