<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 957 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155615</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow Modvat credit based on provisionally assessed bill of entry and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of grounds for denying credit solely on the basis of provisional assessment and noted the absence of any provision in the relevant rules to support such denial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 17:49:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 957 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155615</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow Modvat credit based on provisionally assessed bill of entry and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of grounds for denying credit solely on the basis of provisional assessment and noted the absence of any provision in the relevant rules to support such denial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>