<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 386 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155609</link>
    <description>The Tribunal could reduce penalty in a departmental appeal, but that discretion had to be exercised on stated reasons and disclosed circumstances. A penalty reduction affecting party rights cannot stand where the order gives no basis for the exercise of discretion. The Rajasthan High Court therefore found the reduction improper, set it aside, and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for a fresh decision after hearing both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 17:18:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 386 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155609</link>
      <description>The Tribunal could reduce penalty in a departmental appeal, but that discretion had to be exercised on stated reasons and disclosed circumstances. A penalty reduction affecting party rights cannot stand where the order gives no basis for the exercise of discretion. The Rajasthan High Court therefore found the reduction improper, set it aside, and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for a fresh decision after hearing both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>