<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 569 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155599</link>
    <description>Revisional interference was unwarranted where the books of account had been rejected on inspection findings showing stock discrepancy and unaccounted transactions, which were sufficient material to discard the accounts. Once the accounts were rejected, turnover had to be assessed on a best judgment basis. The Tribunal, as the final fact-finding authority, fixed turnover at three times the average running stock after considering the record, and that estimation was sustained because it rested on relevant material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:47:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 569 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155599</link>
      <description>Revisional interference was unwarranted where the books of account had been rejected on inspection findings showing stock discrepancy and unaccounted transactions, which were sufficient material to discard the accounts. Once the accounts were rejected, turnover had to be assessed on a best judgment basis. The Tribunal, as the final fact-finding authority, fixed turnover at three times the average running stock after considering the record, and that estimation was sustained because it rested on relevant material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>