<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 443 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155598</link>
    <description>Sales of bamboos by contractors were treated as the first sale under item 75 of the First Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, because Explanation V, as amended, brought such sales within the first-sale levy. The contention that the Forest Department was the first seller was inconsistent with the amended statutory scheme. Transport charges incurred by the assessee and recovered from the buyer were also included in taxable turnover, as the definition of &quot;turnover&quot; in section 2(s) was held wide enough to cover such charges. Both challenges failed, and the tax revision was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:45:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 443 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155598</link>
      <description>Sales of bamboos by contractors were treated as the first sale under item 75 of the First Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, because Explanation V, as amended, brought such sales within the first-sale levy. The contention that the Forest Department was the first seller was inconsistent with the amended statutory scheme. Transport charges incurred by the assessee and recovered from the buyer were also included in taxable turnover, as the definition of &quot;turnover&quot; in section 2(s) was held wide enough to cover such charges. Both challenges failed, and the tax revision was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>