<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 988 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155588</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that no penalty was imposable under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act due to the absence of deliberate evasion and the availability of Cenvat Credit between the units. The decision emphasized the need for the department to prove mis-declaration or suppression with an intent to evade duty, citing relevant judgments to support the conclusion that penalties were not applicable in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:02:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 988 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155588</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that no penalty was imposable under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act due to the absence of deliberate evasion and the availability of Cenvat Credit between the units. The decision emphasized the need for the department to prove mis-declaration or suppression with an intent to evade duty, citing relevant judgments to support the conclusion that penalties were not applicable in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>