<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 370 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155562</link>
    <description>The court ruled that filing F forms is not mandatory under section 6A(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision deeming F form submission compulsory was overturned, and the court directed modification of the order in favor of the petitioner, allowing alternative methods for proving transfer of goods not by way of sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 370 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155562</link>
      <description>The court ruled that filing F forms is not mandatory under section 6A(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision deeming F form submission compulsory was overturned, and the court directed modification of the order in favor of the petitioner, allowing alternative methods for proving transfer of goods not by way of sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>