<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 369 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155556</link>
    <description>Section 14(4) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act permits reassessment only where turnover has escaped assessment, been under-assessed, assessed at a lower rate, or where exemption or deduction was wrongly allowed. Reopening cannot rest on a mere change of opinion about classification or on reconsideration of material already on the assessment record, because the reassessment power operates only on material outside that record showing escapement or incorrect assessment. An internal audit party&#039;s opinion on a point of law is not sufficient material for reopening. By contrast, a binding decision of a higher judicial or statutory authority on the relevant issue may constitute valid material for reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:36:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 369 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155556</link>
      <description>Section 14(4) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act permits reassessment only where turnover has escaped assessment, been under-assessed, assessed at a lower rate, or where exemption or deduction was wrongly allowed. Reopening cannot rest on a mere change of opinion about classification or on reconsideration of material already on the assessment record, because the reassessment power operates only on material outside that record showing escapement or incorrect assessment. An internal audit party&#039;s opinion on a point of law is not sufficient material for reopening. By contrast, a binding decision of a higher judicial or statutory authority on the relevant issue may constitute valid material for reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>