<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 567 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155543</link>
    <description>Rims used in wheels of cycles and other vehicles were treated as falling within the specific CST entry covering &quot;wheels, tyres, axles and wheel sets&quot; rather than the residuary entry. The reasoning was that rims are an integral component of a wheel, or at least of a wheel set, and the specific entry was not displaced merely because rims were not separately named. In the absence of any competing specific entry, the term &quot;wheel&quot; was given its ordinary commercial meaning, and the interpretation favourable to the taxpayer was preferred where the construction was plausible. On that basis, the residuary entry was not applied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 567 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155543</link>
      <description>Rims used in wheels of cycles and other vehicles were treated as falling within the specific CST entry covering &quot;wheels, tyres, axles and wheel sets&quot; rather than the residuary entry. The reasoning was that rims are an integral component of a wheel, or at least of a wheel set, and the specific entry was not displaced merely because rims were not separately named. In the absence of any competing specific entry, the term &quot;wheel&quot; was given its ordinary commercial meaning, and the interpretation favourable to the taxpayer was preferred where the construction was plausible. On that basis, the residuary entry was not applied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>