<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 471 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155529</link>
    <description>The High Court found the Commercial Tax Officer guilty of contempt for disobeying its judgment regarding the tax rate on protein flour. Despite citing a pending appeal in the Supreme Court, the officer failed to provide specific details or substantiation for the appeal. The court emphasized the importance of subordinate authorities following its decisions unless suspended by the Supreme Court to uphold respect for the law and the court&#039;s authority. The officer apologized, attributing the disobedience to inadvertence and work pressure, leading the court to drop further proceedings and issue a warning for adherence to High Court decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 12:18:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 471 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155529</link>
      <description>The High Court found the Commercial Tax Officer guilty of contempt for disobeying its judgment regarding the tax rate on protein flour. Despite citing a pending appeal in the Supreme Court, the officer failed to provide specific details or substantiation for the appeal. The court emphasized the importance of subordinate authorities following its decisions unless suspended by the Supreme Court to uphold respect for the law and the court&#039;s authority. The officer apologized, attributing the disobedience to inadvertence and work pressure, leading the court to drop further proceedings and issue a warning for adherence to High Court decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>