<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 368 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155512</link>
    <description>The court classified printed materials such as cheque books, registers, letter pads, bonds, forms, share certificates, and ration cards as the sale of finished goods rather than works contracts. Items falling under these categories were deemed taxable. However, annual audit reports, financial statements, and pamphlets were considered works contracts not subject to sales tax. The court partly allowed the writ petition, quashing orders related to works contracts while upholding those concerning the sale of finished goods. The Additional Sales Tax Officer was directed to issue fresh assessment orders, and each party was to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 11:19:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 368 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155512</link>
      <description>The court classified printed materials such as cheque books, registers, letter pads, bonds, forms, share certificates, and ration cards as the sale of finished goods rather than works contracts. Items falling under these categories were deemed taxable. However, annual audit reports, financial statements, and pamphlets were considered works contracts not subject to sales tax. The court partly allowed the writ petition, quashing orders related to works contracts while upholding those concerning the sale of finished goods. The Additional Sales Tax Officer was directed to issue fresh assessment orders, and each party was to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>