<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 942 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155510</link>
    <description>Interest on borrowings was held not to be disallowable where the assessee had sufficient own funds, the advances were short-term and made in the ordinary course of business, and the Revenue failed to prove diversion of borrowed money to non-business use. Advances to related entities, including group finance concerns and a security deposit for a proposed godown, were accepted as commercially expedient and supported by business considerations, so the corresponding disallowances were sustained as not warranting interference. Interest paid on overdue supplier bills to an associate concern was also treated as allowable because the payment had a business nexus, the transaction was genuine, and the Revenue could not substitute its view of commercial prudence for that of the businessman.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 942 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155510</link>
      <description>Interest on borrowings was held not to be disallowable where the assessee had sufficient own funds, the advances were short-term and made in the ordinary course of business, and the Revenue failed to prove diversion of borrowed money to non-business use. Advances to related entities, including group finance concerns and a security deposit for a proposed godown, were accepted as commercially expedient and supported by business considerations, so the corresponding disallowances were sustained as not warranting interference. Interest paid on overdue supplier bills to an associate concern was also treated as allowable because the payment had a business nexus, the transaction was genuine, and the Revenue could not substitute its view of commercial prudence for that of the businessman.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>