<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 870 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155509</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal of the assessee and dismissed the department&#039;s appeal. The disallowance of remuneration paid to partners under section 40A(2)(b) was deleted, amounting to Rs.27,00,000. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer cannot question the reasonableness of remuneration paid to a working partner under section 40(b). Additionally, the deductibility of Rs.7,00,000 paid to Surat Municipal Corporation was upheld, as it was deemed an impact fee for deviating from the approved plan, not a penalty for infringing the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 10:20:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 870 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155509</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal of the assessee and dismissed the department&#039;s appeal. The disallowance of remuneration paid to partners under section 40A(2)(b) was deleted, amounting to Rs.27,00,000. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer cannot question the reasonableness of remuneration paid to a working partner under section 40(b). Additionally, the deductibility of Rs.7,00,000 paid to Surat Municipal Corporation was upheld, as it was deemed an impact fee for deviating from the approved plan, not a penalty for infringing the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>