<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 367 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155502</link>
    <description>Under section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, exemption on subsequent sales is available where Form E-I is produced even though Form C is not, so refusal of exemption on that basis is unsustainable. However, where neither Form E-I nor Form C is produced, the statutory requirement for exemption is not met and denial of relief is justified. The result is that the exemption applies only to transactions supported by Form E-I, while transactions lacking both declaration forms remain taxable and may be reassessed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 18:26:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 367 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155502</link>
      <description>Under section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, exemption on subsequent sales is available where Form E-I is produced even though Form C is not, so refusal of exemption on that basis is unsustainable. However, where neither Form E-I nor Form C is produced, the statutory requirement for exemption is not met and denial of relief is justified. The result is that the exemption applies only to transactions supported by Form E-I, while transactions lacking both declaration forms remain taxable and may be reassessed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>