https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155500 The Judge found that the appellant's misdeclaration of weight for claiming higher drawback was intentional, leading to confiscation of goods and imposition of penalty under relevant Customs Act provisions. Despite this, the Judge reduced the redemption fine and penalty due to the minimal excess drawback claimed, allowing the appellant to export the goods on payment of reduced fines within a specified timeframe to be eligible for drawback. Failure to export would require payment of original fines as per the initial order. The appeal, stay application, and miscellaneous application were disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Sep 2013 18:11:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155500 The Judge found that the appellant's misdeclaration of weight for claiming higher drawback was intentional, leading to confiscation of goods and imposition of penalty under relevant Customs Act provisions. Despite this, the Judge reduced the redemption fine and penalty due to the minimal excess drawback claimed, allowing the appellant to export the goods on payment of reduced fines within a specified timeframe to be eligible for drawback. Failure to export would require payment of original fines as per the initial order. The appeal, stay application, and miscellaneous application were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155500