<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (3) TMI 506 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155488</link>
    <description>Double plated rims qualify as agricultural implements when they are commonly used in agricultural operations and have an intimate, direct connection with those operations; exclusive agricultural use is unnecessary. The relevant State sales tax notification covered agricultural implements other than those operated by human or animal power, while an earlier exemption list for manually or animal-operated implements did not govern this classification. Because the rims were used in power-driven vehicles and commonly used for agriculture, they fell within the agricultural-implement category rather than unclassified goods. Substantially similar language under the Central Sales Tax framework produced the same classification and tax treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 17:11:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (3) TMI 506 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155488</link>
      <description>Double plated rims qualify as agricultural implements when they are commonly used in agricultural operations and have an intimate, direct connection with those operations; exclusive agricultural use is unnecessary. The relevant State sales tax notification covered agricultural implements other than those operated by human or animal power, while an earlier exemption list for manually or animal-operated implements did not govern this classification. Because the rims were used in power-driven vehicles and commonly used for agriculture, they fell within the agricultural-implement category rather than unclassified goods. Substantially similar language under the Central Sales Tax framework produced the same classification and tax treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>