<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1070 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155482</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that penalty under Section 11AC and Rules 25 and 26 of the Central Excise Rules should not be imposed on the respondents as the initial short payment of duty was due to ignorance, not evasion. The Tribunal held that the respondents&#039; timely rectification of the duty shortfall before the show cause notice absolved them from penalty liability. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the lower authority&#039;s decision and finding no grounds for interference in the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 16:56:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1070 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155482</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that penalty under Section 11AC and Rules 25 and 26 of the Central Excise Rules should not be imposed on the respondents as the initial short payment of duty was due to ignorance, not evasion. The Tribunal held that the respondents&#039; timely rectification of the duty shortfall before the show cause notice absolved them from penalty liability. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the lower authority&#039;s decision and finding no grounds for interference in the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>