https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155470 The case involved a review of an adjudication order by the Commissioner, with the revenue appealing for reversal of the order granting relief to the appellant. The revenue succeeded in the appeal, resulting in a duty demand of Rs. 18,87,095 against the appellant. Despite discrepancies in the revenue's stance across different years, the Commissioner's decision on deductions for assessable value stood. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement and stayed demand recovery pending appeal disposal to prevent undue hardship to the appellant, aligning with principles set by the Apex Court. en-us Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Sep 2013 16:06:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155470 The case involved a review of an adjudication order by the Commissioner, with the revenue appealing for reversal of the order granting relief to the appellant. The revenue succeeded in the appeal, resulting in a duty demand of Rs. 18,87,095 against the appellant. Despite discrepancies in the revenue's stance across different years, the Commissioner's decision on deductions for assessable value stood. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement and stayed demand recovery pending appeal disposal to prevent undue hardship to the appellant, aligning with principles set by the Apex Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155470