https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155456 A writ petition challenging show-cause notices proposing entry tax was held premature because the central dispute was factual: whether goods were actually entering a local area for consumption, use or sale. That question required evidence and first-instance determination by the statutory authority, not review at the notice stage. The petitioner was expected to submit its defence before the Sales Tax Officer in reply to the notices. Writ jurisdiction was therefore declined, leaving the authority to decide the matter after hearing the petitioner. en-us Fri, 16 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Sep 2013 15:29:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155456 A writ petition challenging show-cause notices proposing entry tax was held premature because the central dispute was factual: whether goods were actually entering a local area for consumption, use or sale. That question required evidence and first-instance determination by the statutory authority, not review at the notice stage. The petitioner was expected to submit its defence before the Sales Tax Officer in reply to the notices. Writ jurisdiction was therefore declined, leaving the authority to decide the matter after hearing the petitioner. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 16 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155456