<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 562 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155452</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;cost&quot; in a sales tax notification was construed in light of a levy on taxable turnover, so it referred to the sale price of the radio and not the dealer&#039;s purchase price. Because the statute linked tax to the sale transaction and did not define cost price, the notification was read as operating on the price at which the goods were sold. The attempt to substitute purchase cost as the basis for the applicable rate was rejected, and the question was answered in favour of the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 15:08:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 562 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155452</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;cost&quot; in a sales tax notification was construed in light of a levy on taxable turnover, so it referred to the sale price of the radio and not the dealer&#039;s purchase price. Because the statute linked tax to the sale transaction and did not define cost price, the notification was read as operating on the price at which the goods were sold. The attempt to substitute purchase cost as the basis for the applicable rate was rejected, and the question was answered in favour of the department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>