https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155451 Katchi adhat transactions were held not includible in the assessee's taxable turnover, applying the earlier decision in the same assessee's case. The legal position on non-taxability was treated as settled for those transactions. However, the factual distinction between katchi adhat and pucki adhat still required identification for the disputed periods, so remand to the assessing authority for that segregation was upheld. The reference was thus answered by confirming the non-taxability of katchi adhat while sustaining the remand for factual classification of the transactions. en-us Sat, 07 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Sep 2013 15:05:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155451 Katchi adhat transactions were held not includible in the assessee's taxable turnover, applying the earlier decision in the same assessee's case. The legal position on non-taxability was treated as settled for those transactions. However, the factual distinction between katchi adhat and pucki adhat still required identification for the disputed periods, so remand to the assessing authority for that segregation was upheld. The reference was thus answered by confirming the non-taxability of katchi adhat while sustaining the remand for factual classification of the transactions. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Sat, 07 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155451