<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 358 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155440</link>
    <description>Writ interference with reassessment and revisional orders under the M.P. General Sales Tax Act was refused because the orders rested on appraisal of evidence and recorded findings of fact. No manifest error of law or jurisdictional defect was shown to justify certiorari. The challenge based on alleged denial of hearing also failed, as the record showed adequate opportunity had been given; the objections regarding lack of notice of the affidavit and inadequate questioning on seized account books and loose papers were found untenable. The reassessment and revisional orders therefore stood, and no writ relief was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:33:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 358 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155440</link>
      <description>Writ interference with reassessment and revisional orders under the M.P. General Sales Tax Act was refused because the orders rested on appraisal of evidence and recorded findings of fact. No manifest error of law or jurisdictional defect was shown to justify certiorari. The challenge based on alleged denial of hearing also failed, as the record showed adequate opportunity had been given; the objections regarding lack of notice of the affidavit and inadequate questioning on seized account books and loose papers were found untenable. The reassessment and revisional orders therefore stood, and no writ relief was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>