https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155433 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD, in a judgment by Ms. Archana Wadhwa and Shri B.S.V. Murthy, JJ., ruled on the maintainability of an appeal concerning a departmental communication on provisional release of seized goods. The Tribunal held that the communication did not involve a dispute between the appellant and the department but focused on procedural matters. As the letter was not an order under Section 35C eligible for appeal, the Tribunal deemed the appeal not maintainable and dismissed it. This case underscores the necessity of a direct impact on legal rights for orders to be appealable under the law. en-us Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:18:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155433 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD, in a judgment by Ms. Archana Wadhwa and Shri B.S.V. Murthy, JJ., ruled on the maintainability of an appeal concerning a departmental communication on provisional release of seized goods. The Tribunal held that the communication did not involve a dispute between the appellant and the department but focused on procedural matters. As the letter was not an order under Section 35C eligible for appeal, the Tribunal deemed the appeal not maintainable and dismissed it. This case underscores the necessity of a direct impact on legal rights for orders to be appealable under the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155433