<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 426 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155424</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside a reassessment order for the assessment year 1981-82, directing the assessing officer to summon a third party for cross-examination as requested by the assessee. The Court emphasized the importance of providing the assessee with the opportunity to examine and cross-examine third parties whose records are relied upon in reassessment proceedings. Failure to allow such cross-examination can invalidate the reassessment process, requiring a fresh assessment with proper procedural safeguards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 13:05:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 426 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155424</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside a reassessment order for the assessment year 1981-82, directing the assessing officer to summon a third party for cross-examination as requested by the assessee. The Court emphasized the importance of providing the assessee with the opportunity to examine and cross-examine third parties whose records are relied upon in reassessment proceedings. Failure to allow such cross-examination can invalidate the reassessment process, requiring a fresh assessment with proper procedural safeguards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>