<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 424 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155412</link>
    <description>Section 4A(6) of the Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, requiring a Form XC certificate with the return, was upheld as valid because it was directly connected to the show-wise tax scheme and aimed at preventing evasion by verifying days on which no show was held. The challenge based on vagueness and impossibility of compliance failed, as the provision was not ultra vires merely because its implementation needed administrative clarification. At the same time, the court directed the State to prescribe the competent authority, the issuance procedure, the corresponding duty to issue the certificate, and a remedy for refusal or delay so the provision could operate effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:10:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 424 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155412</link>
      <description>Section 4A(6) of the Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, requiring a Form XC certificate with the return, was upheld as valid because it was directly connected to the show-wise tax scheme and aimed at preventing evasion by verifying days on which no show was held. The challenge based on vagueness and impossibility of compliance failed, as the provision was not ultra vires merely because its implementation needed administrative clarification. At the same time, the court directed the State to prescribe the competent authority, the issuance procedure, the corresponding duty to issue the certificate, and a remedy for refusal or delay so the provision could operate effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>