https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155411 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the demand for Central Excise duty on the clearance of dies from one manufacturing shed to others was not sustainable. It was found that the demand was based on the alleged transfer of title to customers without paying duty, but as there was no evidence of actual removal of dies, the duty demand could not be upheld. The Tribunal concluded that the impugned order exceeded the scope of the show cause notice, resulting in the appeal being allowed. en-us Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:08:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155411 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the demand for Central Excise duty on the clearance of dies from one manufacturing shed to others was not sustainable. It was found that the demand was based on the alleged transfer of title to customers without paying duty, but as there was no evidence of actual removal of dies, the duty demand could not be upheld. The Tribunal concluded that the impugned order exceeded the scope of the show cause notice, resulting in the appeal being allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155411